I found two articles this week that propose an alternate approach: a concerted attempt to use the issues of human rights and democracy to topple the Iranian regime.
- Anne Applebaum: "...a sustained and well-funded human rights campaign must be a terrifying prospect. So what if we told the Iranian regime that its insistence on pursuing nuclear weapons leaves us with no choice but to increase funding for dissident exile groups, smuggle money into the country, bombard Iranian airwaves with anti-regime television and, above all, to publicize widely the myriad crimes of the Islamic Republic?
- Robert Kagan likes the sanctions idea, but with a different goal: "It would be better if the administration focused on the regime's instability and ignored the nukes.
This ought to be the goal of the "crippling" sanctions the Obama administration has threatened. Sanctions will not persuade the present Iranian government to give up its nuclear weapons program. Ahmadinejad and Khamenei see the nuclear program and their own survival as intimately linked. But the right kinds of sanctions could help the Iranian opposition topple these still-vulnerable rulers.
Considering the apparent hopelessness of the current approach to Iran, even if Russia comes on board, I think the regime-toppling approach is worth a shot.
No comments :
Post a Comment